GEORGE A JACKSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

82

35%

LEVEL 4

121

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

118

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

70

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

71

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

51

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

47

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

159
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

101

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

179
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

105

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

119

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

116

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

119

53%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

118

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

110

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

77

37%

LEVEL 4

104

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.