JERICHO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

71

12%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

331

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

550
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

69

11%

LEVEL 3

141

22%

LEVEL 4

409

64%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

157

61%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

263
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

24

8%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

192

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

260
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

174

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

287
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

217

63%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

346
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

44

11%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

246

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

397
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

48

11%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

314

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

70

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

79

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

473
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

46

9%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

325

61%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

530
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

53

9%

LEVEL 3

127

21%

LEVEL 4

403

67%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

25

54%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

482
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

63

11%

LEVEL 3

153

27%

LEVEL 4

329

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

548
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

15

2%

LEVEL 2

57

9%

LEVEL 3

140

23%

LEVEL 4

408

66%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

440
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

58

11%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

308

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

487
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

49

9%

LEVEL 3

123

22%

LEVEL 4

364

66%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

23

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

45

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.