Skip to Content
Main content

VERNON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

118

35%

LEVEL 4

86

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

59

35%

LEVEL 4

57

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

86

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

86

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

105

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

17

59%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

118

38%

LEVEL 4

85

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

225
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

108

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

103

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

20

33%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.