OYSTER BAY-EAST NORWICH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

114

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

163

35%

LEVEL 4

134

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

63

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

85

38%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

67

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

84

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

218
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

117

37%

LEVEL 4

101

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

109

27%

LEVEL 3

134

34%

LEVEL 4

114

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

131

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

255
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

142

35%

LEVEL 4

113

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

295
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

161

36%

LEVEL 4

134

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

225
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

103

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

271
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

86

22%

LEVEL 3

144

38%

LEVEL 4

127

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.