LOCUST VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

157

44%

LEVEL 4

106

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

161

43%

LEVEL 4

96

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

62

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

67

39%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

79

43%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

94

47%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

13

50%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

125

45%

LEVEL 4

88

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

132

46%

LEVEL 4

80

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

21

45%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

14

27%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

146

44%

LEVEL 4

105

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

149

43%

LEVEL 4

94

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

12

43%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

261
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

155

44%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

257
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

161

44%

LEVEL 4

96

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

140

45%

LEVEL 4

96

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

145

45%

LEVEL 4

93

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.