NORTH SHORE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

587
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

110

15%

LEVEL 3

266

37%

LEVEL 4

321

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

586
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

29

4%

LEVEL 2

96

14%

LEVEL 3

288

41%

LEVEL 4

298

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

308
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

190

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

290
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

26

8%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

175

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

279
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

148

41%

LEVEL 4

131

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

296
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

173

45%

LEVEL 4

123

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

16

62%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

30

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

28

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

461
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

82

15%

LEVEL 3

211

38%

LEVEL 4

250

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

450
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

64

12%

LEVEL 3

222

41%

LEVEL 4

228

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

38

44%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

550
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

9

1%

LEVEL 2

80

13%

LEVEL 3

238

37%

LEVEL 4

312

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

554
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

70

11%

LEVEL 3

267

42%

LEVEL 4

287

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

583
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

20

3%

LEVEL 2

103

15%

LEVEL 3

262

37%

LEVEL 4

321

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

583
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

28

4%

LEVEL 2

91

13%

LEVEL 3

285

41%

LEVEL 4

298

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

533
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

17

3%

LEVEL 2

93

14%

LEVEL 3

237

37%

LEVEL 4

296

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

536
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

27

4%

LEVEL 2

79

12%

LEVEL 3

255

40%

LEVEL 4

281

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

29

39%

LEVEL 4

25

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

33

48%

LEVEL 4

17

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.