Skip to Content
Main content

SADDLE ROCK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

95

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

107

38%

LEVEL 4

96

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

49

37%

LEVEL 4

50

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

48

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

45

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

45

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

68
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

45

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

66

43%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

70

42%

LEVEL 4

44

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

38

17%

LEVEL 3

96

42%

LEVEL 4

88

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

91

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

20

36%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

196
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

46

18%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

95

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

95

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

92

40%

LEVEL 4

85

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

97

41%

LEVEL 4

86

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.