Skip to Content
Main content

MANHASSET MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

139

40%

LEVEL 4

147

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

146

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

76

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

76

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

26

13%

LEVEL 3

86

44%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

70

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

90
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

64

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

55

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

101

47%

LEVEL 4

74

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

83

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

128

41%

LEVEL 4

147

47%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

38

14%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

141

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

280
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

145

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

146

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.