ROSLYN UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

777
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,046

LEVEL 1

53

5%

LEVEL 2

216

21%

LEVEL 3

436

42%

LEVEL 4

341

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

785
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,056

LEVEL 1

68

6%

LEVEL 2

203

19%

LEVEL 3

422

40%

LEVEL 4

363

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

418
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

100

19%

LEVEL 3

219

41%

LEVEL 4

199

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

418
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

23

4%

LEVEL 2

97

18%

LEVEL 3

197

37%

LEVEL 4

221

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

359
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

116

23%

LEVEL 3

217

43%

LEVEL 4

142

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

367
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

106

20%

LEVEL 3

225

43%

LEVEL 4

142

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

208
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

116

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

222
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

27

10%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

129

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

518
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 691

LEVEL 1

30

4%

LEVEL 2

143

21%

LEVEL 3

309

45%

LEVEL 4

209

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

502
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

138

21%

LEVEL 3

295

44%

LEVEL 4

207

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

17

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

762
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 991

LEVEL 1

37

4%

LEVEL 2

192

19%

LEVEL 3

423

43%

LEVEL 4

339

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

769
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 991

LEVEL 1

42

4%

LEVEL 2

180

18%

LEVEL 3

407

41%

LEVEL 4

362

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

24

44%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

26

40%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

777
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,029

LEVEL 1

45

4%

LEVEL 2

207

20%

LEVEL 3

436

42%

LEVEL 4

341

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

782
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,028

LEVEL 1

51

5%

LEVEL 2

195

19%

LEVEL 3

419

41%

LEVEL 4

363

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

711
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 917

LEVEL 1

38

4%

LEVEL 2

168

18%

LEVEL 3

395

43%

LEVEL 4

316

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

720
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 926

LEVEL 1

45

5%

LEVEL 2

161

17%

LEVEL 3

374

40%

LEVEL 4

346

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.