Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH MERRICK UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

142

44%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

147

40%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

72

41%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

70

48%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

72

40%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

17

47%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

100

45%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

103

42%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

17

41%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

136

45%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

144

43%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

130

46%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

135

41%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.