JOHN LEWIS CHILDS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

84

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

117

42%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

63

49%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

54

45%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

63

40%

LEVEL 4

38

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

25

43%

LEVEL 4

20

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

27

39%

LEVEL 4

23

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

67

41%

LEVEL 4

47

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

69

49%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

24

49%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

112

44%

LEVEL 4

83

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

58

23%

LEVEL 3

113

45%

LEVEL 4

72

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

203
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

119

42%

LEVEL 4

84

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

102

44%

LEVEL 4

72

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

92

43%

LEVEL 4

66

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

25

41%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.