LYNBROOK UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

145

26%

LEVEL 3

242

43%

LEVEL 4

112

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

172

29%

LEVEL 3

258

44%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

126

47%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

133

47%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

125

41%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

24

48%

LEVEL 4

15

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

18

39%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

155

46%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

163

48%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

16

43%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

41

35%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

52

40%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

342
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

125

25%

LEVEL 3

232

46%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

243

47%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

25

44%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

354
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

58

10%

LEVEL 2

142

26%

LEVEL 3

242

44%

LEVEL 4

112

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

352
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

166

29%

LEVEL 3

258

45%

LEVEL 4

94

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

111

24%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

101

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

313
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

131

28%

LEVEL 3

226

47%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

31

28%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

348
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

171

29%

LEVEL 3

255

44%

LEVEL 4

93

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.