Skip to Content
Main content

CLARKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

117

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

65

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

56

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

52

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

85
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

51

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

91
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

52

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

43

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

117

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

204
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

117

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

104

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

81

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

34

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.