Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 9-DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

231

65%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

237

65%

LEVEL 2

84

23%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

98

64%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

94

57%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

133

66%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

143

71%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

176

73%

LEVEL 2

49

20%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

188

70%

LEVEL 2

57

21%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

172

60%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

181

60%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

59

89%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

56

90%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

100

49%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

125

89%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

137

85%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

225

65%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

228

64%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

218

65%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

222

64%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

37

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.