Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 5-JOHN WILLIAMS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

255

64%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

259

62%

LEVEL 2

110

26%

LEVEL 3

38

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

104

56%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

110

56%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

151

71%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

149

67%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

34

54%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

130

69%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

133

67%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

56

56%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

54

56%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

195

58%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

204

58%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

60

92%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

55

89%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

181

60%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

175

58%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

74

76%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

84

73%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

245

64%

LEVEL 2

97

25%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

250

63%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

29

7%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

227

62%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

243

63%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.