GENERAL BROWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

146

23%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

146

24%

LEVEL 2

203

33%

LEVEL 3

183

29%

LEVEL 4

89

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

124

39%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

136

23%

LEVEL 2

190

33%

LEVEL 3

190

33%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

137

24%

LEVEL 2

191

33%

LEVEL 3

175

30%

LEVEL 4

78

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

89

17%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

193

37%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

91

18%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

173

33%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

57

53%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

55

53%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

65

17%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

150

38%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

69

31%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

279
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

143

23%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.