ATHENA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

184

35%

LEVEL 2

146

28%

LEVEL 3

118

23%

LEVEL 4

75

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

114

43%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

37

58%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

36

53%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

128

28%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

25

64%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

56

85%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

192
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

170

34%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

117

23%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

14

88%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

58

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

135

56%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.