Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

122

21%

LEVEL 2

182

32%

LEVEL 3

195

34%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

176

26%

LEVEL 2

237

34%

LEVEL 3

185

27%

LEVEL 4

89

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

102

37%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

119

22%

LEVEL 2

170

31%

LEVEL 3

189

34%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

263
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

165

25%

LEVEL 2

230

35%

LEVEL 3

178

27%

LEVEL 4

85

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

170

32%

LEVEL 3

191

36%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

131

21%

LEVEL 2

221

36%

LEVEL 3

179

29%

LEVEL 4

89

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

45

67%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

126

40%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.