ORCHARD PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

63

10%

LEVEL 2

195

32%

LEVEL 3

203

34%

LEVEL 4

142

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

86

13%

LEVEL 2

183

28%

LEVEL 3

180

27%

LEVEL 4

214

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

103

37%

LEVEL 4

92

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

216
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

125

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

89

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

315
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

187

33%

LEVEL 3

186

33%

LEVEL 4

129

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

363
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

173

28%

LEVEL 3

169

28%

LEVEL 4

194

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

139

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

155

27%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

211

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

33

44%

LEVEL 2

34

45%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

40

50%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

317
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

187

35%

LEVEL 4

130

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

362
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

164

28%

LEVEL 4

198

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.