Skip to Content
Main content

LANCASTER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

692
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,362

LEVEL 1

203

15%

LEVEL 2

467

34%

LEVEL 3

499

37%

LEVEL 4

193

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

744
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,581

LEVEL 1

269

17%

LEVEL 2

568

36%

LEVEL 3

549

35%

LEVEL 4

195

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

377
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

60

9%

LEVEL 2

198

31%

LEVEL 3

252

40%

LEVEL 4

125

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

408
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

98

13%

LEVEL 2

239

32%

LEVEL 3

290

39%

LEVEL 4

118

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

315
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

143

20%

LEVEL 2

269

37%

LEVEL 3

247

34%

LEVEL 4

68

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

336
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

171

20%

LEVEL 2

329

39%

LEVEL 3

259

31%

LEVEL 4

77

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

623
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,213

LEVEL 1

165

14%

LEVEL 2

425

35%

LEVEL 3

445

37%

LEVEL 4

178

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

676
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,417

LEVEL 1

231

16%

LEVEL 2

510

36%

LEVEL 3

496

35%

LEVEL 4

180

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

23

36%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

19

32%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

672
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,180

LEVEL 1

111

9%

LEVEL 2

397

34%

LEVEL 3

481

41%

LEVEL 4

191

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

712
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,349

LEVEL 1

150

11%

LEVEL 2

487

36%

LEVEL 3

518

38%

LEVEL 4

194

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

92

51%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

119

51%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

691
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,354

LEVEL 1

199

15%

LEVEL 2

464

34%

LEVEL 3

498

37%

LEVEL 4

193

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

743
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,571

LEVEL 1

265

17%

LEVEL 2

563

36%

LEVEL 3

548

35%

LEVEL 4

195

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

569
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,021

LEVEL 1

132

13%

LEVEL 2

320

31%

LEVEL 3

396

39%

LEVEL 4

173

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

633
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,222

LEVEL 1

163

13%

LEVEL 2

426

35%

LEVEL 3

460

38%

LEVEL 4

173

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

147

43%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.