GRAND ISLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

470
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

109

13%

LEVEL 2

258

31%

LEVEL 3

301

36%

LEVEL 4

169

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 844

LEVEL 1

155

18%

LEVEL 2

296

35%

LEVEL 3

273

32%

LEVEL 4

120

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

281
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

175

41%

LEVEL 4

106

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

147

35%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

184
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

96

22%

LEVEL 2

149

35%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

29

48%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

404
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 702

LEVEL 1

89

13%

LEVEL 2

209

30%

LEVEL 3

261

37%

LEVEL 4

143

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

340
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

123

18%

LEVEL 2

229

33%

LEVEL 3

236

34%

LEVEL 4

104

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

19

49%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

456
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

63

8%

LEVEL 2

233

31%

LEVEL 3

292

39%

LEVEL 4

164

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

384
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

108

14%

LEVEL 2

260

35%

LEVEL 3

265

35%

LEVEL 4

119

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

46

54%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

47

51%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

464
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 815

LEVEL 1

99

12%

LEVEL 2

252

31%

LEVEL 3

297

36%

LEVEL 4

167

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

390
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 826

LEVEL 1

145

18%

LEVEL 2

291

35%

LEVEL 3

270

33%

LEVEL 4

120

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

369
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

181

30%

LEVEL 3

236

39%

LEVEL 4

133

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

211

34%

LEVEL 3

214

34%

LEVEL 4

107

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

391
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

153

18%

LEVEL 2

293

35%

LEVEL 3

271

32%

LEVEL 4

120

14%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.