COMMUNITY SCHOOL #53 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

147

63%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

163

57%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

62

57%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

75

55%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

85

68%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

88

59%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

127

67%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

139

64%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

100

59%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

118

55%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

47

72%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

139

63%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

152

58%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

7

88%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

146

65%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

159

59%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

139

64%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

154

57%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.