CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

116

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

92

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

62

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

56

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

31

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

24

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

75

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

115

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

91

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

254
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

116

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

66

18%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

92

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

105

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

122

38%

LEVEL 4

81

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

22

38%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.