RED HOOK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

188

35%

LEVEL 4

108

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

100

17%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

211

35%

LEVEL 4

127

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

98

36%

LEVEL 4

73

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

92

30%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

160

35%

LEVEL 4

97

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

291
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

181

36%

LEVEL 4

110

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

182

39%

LEVEL 4

108

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

131

25%

LEVEL 3

199

38%

LEVEL 4

124

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

35

43%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

295
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

187

36%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

336
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

91

16%

LEVEL 2

159

27%

LEVEL 3

209

36%

LEVEL 4

127

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

239
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

149

38%

LEVEL 4

90

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

270
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

166

37%

LEVEL 4

104

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.