SPACKENKILL UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

82

16%

LEVEL 2

160

32%

LEVEL 3

177

35%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

92

16%

LEVEL 2

155

28%

LEVEL 3

191

34%

LEVEL 4

120

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

26

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

31

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

111

39%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

25

32%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

173

38%

LEVEL 4

86

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

139

28%

LEVEL 3

185

37%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

30

60%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

36

61%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

80

16%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

177

35%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

310
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

90

16%

LEVEL 2

150

27%

LEVEL 3

190

35%

LEVEL 4

120

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

138

37%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

111

27%

LEVEL 3

150

36%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.