LAGRANGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

234

38%

LEVEL 2

212

35%

LEVEL 3

114

19%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

273

41%

LEVEL 2

191

29%

LEVEL 3

118

18%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

104

33%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

150

47%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

169

48%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

14

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

56

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

31

42%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

39

49%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

93

54%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

112

22%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

187

33%

LEVEL 2

176

31%

LEVEL 3

116

20%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

70

76%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

86

83%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

165
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

203

35%

LEVEL 2

211

36%

LEVEL 3

114

20%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

245

38%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

118

18%

LEVEL 4

88

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

31

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

154

36%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

127

52%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

119

48%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

233

39%

LEVEL 2

209

35%

LEVEL 3

112

19%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.