TITUSVILLE INTERMEDIATE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

139

39%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

82

45%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

111

39%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

136

43%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

30

75%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

116

39%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

176
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

137

41%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

14

54%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

86

45%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

97

45%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

54

40%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.