HOMER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

110

30%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

57

32%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

104

29%

LEVEL 2

114

32%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

89

25%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

76

23%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

99

30%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

71

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

34

72%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

52

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

70

47%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.