NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

200

31%

LEVEL 2

236

36%

LEVEL 3

162

25%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

226

37%

LEVEL 2

197

33%

LEVEL 3

130

21%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

102

34%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

123

36%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

144

47%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

179

31%

LEVEL 2

205

35%

LEVEL 3

147

25%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

199

37%

LEVEL 2

174

32%

LEVEL 3

118

22%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

124

23%

LEVEL 2

210

38%

LEVEL 3

157

29%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

149

29%

LEVEL 2

179

35%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

76

71%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

77

79%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

222

37%

LEVEL 2

197

33%

LEVEL 3

129

21%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

82

34%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

158

38%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

168

45%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

216
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

197

31%

LEVEL 2

228

36%

LEVEL 3

160

25%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

182
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

219

37%

LEVEL 2

195

33%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.