SILVER CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

105

25%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

89

42%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

35

57%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

62

78%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

150
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

82

35%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

103

28%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.