GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

136

29%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

130

28%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

151

35%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

99

44%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

42

39%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

45

48%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

99

28%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

46

59%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

52

69%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

133

29%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

128

27%

LEVEL 4

39

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.