TIOUGHNIOGA RIVERSIDE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

129

29%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

127

26%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

117

24%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

79

35%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

124

27%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

52

71%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

57

70%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

102

37%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

123

28%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

120

26%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

115

25%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.