Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO BRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

143

39%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

80

43%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

114

37%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

119

39%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

29

56%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

72

38%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

55

34%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.