Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

159

26%

LEVEL 2

201

33%

LEVEL 3

161

27%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

147

25%

LEVEL 2

190

33%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

85

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

145

26%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

132

25%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

181

34%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

82

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

180

36%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

54

69%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

57

76%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

171
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

242
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

156

26%

LEVEL 2

200

33%

LEVEL 3

160

27%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.