Skip to Content
Main content

CUBA-RUSHFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

61

40%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

25

46%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

28

49%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

51

39%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

59

18%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

120

37%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.