ALBANY SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

72

55%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

68

54%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

63

51%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

56

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

88

41%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

25

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

28

93%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

106

45%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

24

26%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

32

38%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

77

49%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

84

52%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.