Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

147

39%

LEVEL 2

138

37%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

64

30%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

80

45%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

96
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

137

37%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

129

40%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

110

32%

LEVEL 2

125

37%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

124

37%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

31

57%

LEVEL 2

21

39%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

142

41%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

145

39%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.