GORDON PARKS SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

108

20%

LEVEL 2

188

34%

LEVEL 3

181

33%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

170

32%

LEVEL 3

188

35%

LEVEL 4

81

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

69

26%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

243
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

103

19%

LEVEL 2

183

35%

LEVEL 3

173

33%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

256
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

95

18%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

176

34%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

166

35%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

148

31%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

40

54%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

31

48%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

117

32%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

137

36%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

247
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

104

19%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

177

33%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

185

35%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.