HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

184

34%

LEVEL 3

220

41%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

222

42%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

124

41%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

135

45%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

96

40%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

244
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

150

34%

LEVEL 3

181

41%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

237
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

152

35%

LEVEL 3

181

42%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

32

39%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

36

43%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

196

44%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

197

46%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

40

43%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

53

51%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

296
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

175

33%

LEVEL 3

217

41%

LEVEL 4

79

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

298
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

48

9%

LEVEL 2

176

34%

LEVEL 3

220

42%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

42

53%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

36

45%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

165

36%

LEVEL 3

178

38%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

155

34%

LEVEL 3

186

41%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

265
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

49

10%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

197

42%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.