GIRLS PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

108

26%

LEVEL 3

179

43%

LEVEL 4

102

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

112

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

126
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

86

45%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

119
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

137
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

83

41%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

61

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

162

47%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

24

32%

LEVEL 2

32

42%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

42

49%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

34

36%

LEVEL 4

25

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

145

44%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

243
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

153

43%

LEVEL 4

90

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.