Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX SCHOOL OF YOUNG LEADERS (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

71

20%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

140

36%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

56

33%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

88

43%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

114

41%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

93

30%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

37

65%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

47

66%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

121
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

73

23%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

41

68%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

55

83%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

91

30%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

124

38%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

94

31%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

18

42%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.