Skip to Content
Main content

URBAN CHOICE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

127

51%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

53

45%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

61

50%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

90

54%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

94

53%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

94

44%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

111

49%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

20

80%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

118

51%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

104

46%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

115

49%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.