ANDERSON SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

279

80%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

255

78%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

162

89%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

138

82%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

117

71%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

117

73%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

26
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

21

81%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

30

94%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

77

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

94
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

77

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

155

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

124

76%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

23

70%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

20

71%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

272

81%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

246

78%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

9

64%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

260

82%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

206

77%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

19

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

49

79%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.