Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ALBANY COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

108

26%

LEVEL 2

177

43%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

116

28%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

116
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

168

44%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

128
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

108

28%

LEVEL 2

145

38%

LEVEL 3

99

26%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

105

26%

LEVEL 2

175

43%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

115

28%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

176

43%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

140
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

157

43%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

101

25%

LEVEL 2

174

43%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.