WASHINGTON HEIGHTS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

119

45%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

137

50%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

77

49%

LEVEL 4

41

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

83

53%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

42

38%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

54

46%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

176
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

113

45%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

193
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

129

50%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

67

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

125

51%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

11

55%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

115

45%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

133

52%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

16

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

108

45%

LEVEL 4

55

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

121

51%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

191
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

127

49%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.