ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BROWNSVILLE CHARTE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

191

36%

LEVEL 3

190

36%

LEVEL 4

98

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

207

39%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

120

39%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

120

41%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

250
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

165

37%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

259
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

183

41%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

31

44%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

175

38%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

186

41%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

37

50%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

285
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

184

35%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

97

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

295
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

201

39%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

43

41%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

167

37%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

164

39%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

271
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

49

10%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

178

36%

LEVEL 4

93

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.