Skip to Content
Main content

ST HOPE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

51

38%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

47

31%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

53

30%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

24

23%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

27

39%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

12

48%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

78

28%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

100

41%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

12

25%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.