BRONX ACADEMY OF PROMISE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

157

39%

LEVEL 4

93

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

169

43%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

63

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

90

43%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

84

44%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

79

42%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

109
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

94
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

87

40%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

129
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

97

44%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

140

42%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

149

44%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

33

51%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

27

50%

LEVEL 3

20

37%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

236
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

144

42%

LEVEL 4

92

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

159

45%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

14

26%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

23

56%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

158

43%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

232
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

148

40%

LEVEL 4

84

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.