Skip to Content
Main content

PIONEER ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

196

44%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

127

30%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

101

24%

LEVEL 2

189

44%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

118

29%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

160

45%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

51

54%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

130

43%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

121

42%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

61

43%

LEVEL 2

66

46%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

78

56%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

191

44%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

179

45%

LEVEL 3

99

25%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

135
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

139

36%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.