GROWING UP GREEN CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

186

35%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

73

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

194

37%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

32

42%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

31

45%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

72

47%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

69

46%

LEVEL 4

44

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

32

49%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

165

42%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

168

42%

LEVEL 4

82

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

65

47%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

260
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

187

38%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

281
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

59

12%

LEVEL 2

157

32%

LEVEL 3

190

38%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

18

49%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

15

54%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

116

46%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

109

45%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

255
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

178

35%

LEVEL 3

186

37%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.